The prices that we are experiencing are the result of a slowly but steadily increasing worldwide demand for oil and the slow but steadily diminishing oil supply. There has not been a catastrophic event that is making prices spike.
Cheney and Bush talk about attacking Iran. If that happened Iran would begin sinking oil tanker ships. If there is such an event prices could spike very quickly. And Bush, Cheney and a good chunk of the Bush Administration could double their oil fortunes over night.
The station owners need to start thinking about new signs with room for an extra set of digits. A row of three digits might not be enough if prices go over $9.99 per gallon.
Jim
________________________________________
July 15, 2008
A Shortage at the Pump: Not of Gas, but of 4s
By KEN BELSON
If one is the loneliest number, then four is the hottest — at least when it comes to gasoline.
With regular gas in New York City at a near-record $4.40 a gallon, station managers are rummaging through their storage closets in search of extra 4s to display on their pumps. Many are coming up short.
That’s why Vishal Nair, who runs the Lukoil station at Eighth Avenue and 13th Street in Greenwich Village, took another plastic number last week, turned it over and scribbled “4” on it with a black magic marker. The result was an obviously homemade “$4.47,” but it would have to do until he received the extra 4s he ordered months ago.
“Typically, we have a lot of 9s and 1s, and we had a shortage of 3s before we got a lot of 3s in,” Mr. Nair said.
The missing digits are an unanticipated barometer of how frequently prices are changing. The average price of regular gasoline in New York City has risen by 35 percent this year, forcing station managers to change their price displays almost every time they get a delivery, which can be daily at some stations.
Franchises often order numbers from their parent companies, though like independent station owners, they can buy directly from sign companies. Sets of 40 include equal numbers of each digit, which are magnetic or slip into plastic holders. Digits, which are often in a Helvetica font, are sold individually for as little as a $1.50. In New York, numbers must be 4.5 or 9 inches tall.
When prices passed $4, many stations ran out of 4s, and managers improvised by photocopying signs or stenciling numbers by hand.
The makeshift digits are legal as long as they are similar to the neighboring numbers, said John Browne, the assistant director of enforcement for the city’s Department of Consumer Affairs’ petroleum unit.
“As long as the color and size are correct and it is apparent what the number is, they are fine,” said Mr. Browne, who inspected Mr. Nair’s handiwork last Friday at the Lukoil station…
To read the rest of the article go to:
http://www.nytimes.com/
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Friday, July 4, 2008
Rove’s Third Term
"Even though I'm a tranquil guy now at this stage of my life, I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious of traitors."
-- George Herbert Walker Bush, 1999
Karl Rove is among those “most insidious of traitors”. Karl Rove is responsible for undermining years of work by Valerie Plame tracing the proliferation of weapons grade nuclear material. Rove has the blood of CIA operatives, real patriots, on his hands. The fact that he still leads the Republican Party says a lot about what it means to be a Republican in the Twenty-first Century.
One Chester County Republican Committeeperson and one Republican Committeeperson who recently stepped down from the CCRC in Chester County have people closely associated with them convicted of selling crack cocaine- their sons. I believe that says a lot about what it means to be a member of the CCRC.
I guess that it why Chester County Republicans hold their heads high. What else can you do when you are standing waist deep in manure?
Jim
________________
July 4, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist
Rove’s Third Term
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Al Gore never claimed that he invented the Internet. Howard Dean didn’t scream. Hillary Clinton didn’t say she was staying in the race because Barack Obama might be assassinated. And Wesley Clark didn’t impugn John McCain’s military service.
Scott McClellan, the former White House press secretary, titled his tell-all memoir “What Happened.” But a true account of modern American politics should be titled “What Didn’t Happen.” Again and again we’ve had media firestorms over supposedly revealing incidents that never actually took place.
The latest fake scandal fit the usual pattern as an awkwardly phrased remark, lifted out of context and willfully misinterpreted, exploded across the airwaves.
What General Clark actually said was that Mr. McCain’s war service, though heroic, didn’t necessarily constitute a qualification for the presidency. It was a blunt but truthful remark, and not at all outrageous — especially given the fact that General Clark is himself a bona fide war hero.
Yet the Clark affair did reveal something important — not about General Clark, but about Mr. McCain. Now we know what a McCain administration would represent: namely, a third term for Karl Rove.
It was predictable that the McCain campaign would go wild over the Clark remarks. Mr. McCain’s run for the White House has always been based on persona rather than policy: he doesn’t have ideas that voters agree with, but he does have an inspiring life story — which, contrary to the myth of the modest maverick, he talks about all the time. The suggestion that this life story isn’t relevant to his quest for office was bound to provoke a violent reaction.
But the McCain campaign went beyond condemning General Clark’s remarks; it went out of its way to distort them. “This backhanded slap against John as not being a worthy warrior because he just got shot down is one of the more surprising insults in my military history,” said retired Col. Bud Day, who participated in a conference call organized by the campaign. In fact, General Clark had said no such thing.
The irony, not lost on Democrats, is that Col. Day himself has done what he falsely accused Wesley Clark of doing: he appeared in the 2004 Swift boat ads that impugned John Kerry’s wartime service.
The willingness of the McCain campaign to engage in these tactics, employing such tainted spokesmen, tells us that the campaign has decided to go negative — specifically, to apply the strategy Karl Rove used so effectively in 2002 and 2004 (but not so effectively in 2006), that of portraying Democrats as unpatriotic.
And sure enough, Adam Nagourney of The New York Times reports signs of the “increasing influence of veterans of Mr. Rove’s shop in the McCain operation.”
Will Rovian tactics work this year?
In 2002 and 2004, Republicans were so successful at playing the patriotism card thanks to a combination of compliant media and cowering Democrats. At first, the Clark affair suggested that nothing has changed. News organizations reported as fact the false assertion that General Clark criticized Mr. McCain’s military service, and the Obama campaign rushed to “reject” his remarks.
“Two days into the Wesley Clark fallout,” wrote the Columbia Journalism Review on Tuesday morning, “the press, the G.O.P., and the Obama campaign all seem to have agreed that Clark’s recent remarks on John McCain’s service record were at best impolitic and at worst despicable.”
Since then, however, both the press and the Obama campaign seem to have recovered some of their balance. Opinion pieces have started to
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
-- George Herbert Walker Bush, 1999
Karl Rove is among those “most insidious of traitors”. Karl Rove is responsible for undermining years of work by Valerie Plame tracing the proliferation of weapons grade nuclear material. Rove has the blood of CIA operatives, real patriots, on his hands. The fact that he still leads the Republican Party says a lot about what it means to be a Republican in the Twenty-first Century.
One Chester County Republican Committeeperson and one Republican Committeeperson who recently stepped down from the CCRC in Chester County have people closely associated with them convicted of selling crack cocaine- their sons. I believe that says a lot about what it means to be a member of the CCRC.
I guess that it why Chester County Republicans hold their heads high. What else can you do when you are standing waist deep in manure?
Jim
________________
July 4, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist
Rove’s Third Term
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Al Gore never claimed that he invented the Internet. Howard Dean didn’t scream. Hillary Clinton didn’t say she was staying in the race because Barack Obama might be assassinated. And Wesley Clark didn’t impugn John McCain’s military service.
Scott McClellan, the former White House press secretary, titled his tell-all memoir “What Happened.” But a true account of modern American politics should be titled “What Didn’t Happen.” Again and again we’ve had media firestorms over supposedly revealing incidents that never actually took place.
The latest fake scandal fit the usual pattern as an awkwardly phrased remark, lifted out of context and willfully misinterpreted, exploded across the airwaves.
What General Clark actually said was that Mr. McCain’s war service, though heroic, didn’t necessarily constitute a qualification for the presidency. It was a blunt but truthful remark, and not at all outrageous — especially given the fact that General Clark is himself a bona fide war hero.
Yet the Clark affair did reveal something important — not about General Clark, but about Mr. McCain. Now we know what a McCain administration would represent: namely, a third term for Karl Rove.
It was predictable that the McCain campaign would go wild over the Clark remarks. Mr. McCain’s run for the White House has always been based on persona rather than policy: he doesn’t have ideas that voters agree with, but he does have an inspiring life story — which, contrary to the myth of the modest maverick, he talks about all the time. The suggestion that this life story isn’t relevant to his quest for office was bound to provoke a violent reaction.
But the McCain campaign went beyond condemning General Clark’s remarks; it went out of its way to distort them. “This backhanded slap against John as not being a worthy warrior because he just got shot down is one of the more surprising insults in my military history,” said retired Col. Bud Day, who participated in a conference call organized by the campaign. In fact, General Clark had said no such thing.
The irony, not lost on Democrats, is that Col. Day himself has done what he falsely accused Wesley Clark of doing: he appeared in the 2004 Swift boat ads that impugned John Kerry’s wartime service.
The willingness of the McCain campaign to engage in these tactics, employing such tainted spokesmen, tells us that the campaign has decided to go negative — specifically, to apply the strategy Karl Rove used so effectively in 2002 and 2004 (but not so effectively in 2006), that of portraying Democrats as unpatriotic.
And sure enough, Adam Nagourney of The New York Times reports signs of the “increasing influence of veterans of Mr. Rove’s shop in the McCain operation.”
Will Rovian tactics work this year?
In 2002 and 2004, Republicans were so successful at playing the patriotism card thanks to a combination of compliant media and cowering Democrats. At first, the Clark affair suggested that nothing has changed. News organizations reported as fact the false assertion that General Clark criticized Mr. McCain’s military service, and the Obama campaign rushed to “reject” his remarks.
“Two days into the Wesley Clark fallout,” wrote the Columbia Journalism Review on Tuesday morning, “the press, the G.O.P., and the Obama campaign all seem to have agreed that Clark’s recent remarks on John McCain’s service record were at best impolitic and at worst despicable.”
Since then, however, both the press and the Obama campaign seem to have recovered some of their balance. Opinion pieces have started to
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/04/opinion/04krugman.html?_
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Anxious in America
Deregulation of electric power transmission gave us an electric power transmission criminal organization named Enron. Areas like Dubai that exist only to launder money (no questions asked) made it possible for Enron’s criminal activity to continue undiscovered for a time.
It is amazing what can happen when you put Billions of dollars into a legitimate business and walk away without ever taking a look at what they are doing with it. I am talking about the deregulation of international financial markets resulting in organized crime becoming the major player in international financial markets.
In my view an unintended outcome of the deregulation theories of Conservative Republicans has, along with the break up of the Soviet Union, led to the unprecedented control of the world economy by international organized crime.
The implementation of Conservative Economic Theory did not work in the early Twentieth Century. Those “Robber Barons” were aptly named. And the USA needed a “New Deal” from Franklin Roosevelt to dig out from under the devastation caused by the Conservatives. It remains to be seen whether voters will understand that the present economic failure of the United States is due to putting Conservative theories into use. Or, will they will blame it on immigration, environmentalists or gay marriage.
We need some kind of “New Deal” to break the downward economic “flat spin” that our country and most of the world economy is in. We may need a world wide “New Deal” to get us out of the coming “Great (Twenty First Century) Depression. Can we do it or will we be stuck with a world of nations that have morphed into extensions of crime syndicates.
From Today’s New York Times in Opinion- Tom Friedman:
June 29, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist
Anxious in America
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Just a few months ago, the consensus view was that Barack Obama would need to choose a hard-core national-security type as his vice presidential running mate to compensate for his lack of foreign policy experience and that John McCain would need a running mate who was young and sprightly to compensate for his age. Come August, though, I predict both men will be looking for a financial wizard as their running mates to help them steer America out of what could become a serious economic tailspin.
I do not believe nation-building in Iraq is going to be the issue come November — whether things get better there or worse. If they get better, we’ll ignore Iraq more; if they get worse, the next president will be under pressure to get out quicker. I think nation-building in America is going to be the issue.
It’s the state of America now that is the most gripping source of anxiety for Americans, not Al Qaeda or Iraq. Anyone who thinks they are going to win this election playing the Iraq or the terrorism card — one way or another — is, in my view, seriously deluded. Things have changed.
Up to now, the economic crisis we’ve been in has been largely a credit crisis in the capital markets, while consumer spending has kept reasonably steady, as have manufacturing and exports. But with banks still reluctant to lend even to healthy businesses, fuel and food prices soaring and home prices declining, this is starting to affect consumers, shrinking their wallets and crimping spending. Unemployment is already creeping up and manufacturing creeping down.
The straws in the wind are hard to ignore: If you visit any car dealership in America today you will see row after row of unsold S.U.V.’s. And if you own a gas guzzler already, good luck. On Thursday, The Palm Beach Post ran an article on your S.U.V. options: “Continue to spend upward of $100 for a fill-up. Sell or trade in the vehicle for a fraction of the original cost. Or hold out and park the truck in the driveway for occasional use in hopes the market will turn around.” Just be glad you don’t own a bus. Montgomery County, Md., where I live, just announced that more children were going to have to walk to school next year to save money on bus fuel.
On top of it all, our bank crisis is not over. Two weeks ago, Goldman Sachs analysts said that U.S. banks may need another $65 billion to cover more write-downs of bad mortgage-related instruments and potential new losses if consumer loans start to buckle. Since President Bush came to office, our national savings have gone from 6 percent of gross domestic product to 1 percent, and consumer debt has climbed from $8 trillion to $14 trillion.
My fellow Americans: We are a country in debt and in decline — not terminal, not irreversible, but in decline. Our political system seems incapable of producing long-range answers to big problems or big opportunities.
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.nytimes.com/
It is amazing what can happen when you put Billions of dollars into a legitimate business and walk away without ever taking a look at what they are doing with it. I am talking about the deregulation of international financial markets resulting in organized crime becoming the major player in international financial markets.
In my view an unintended outcome of the deregulation theories of Conservative Republicans has, along with the break up of the Soviet Union, led to the unprecedented control of the world economy by international organized crime.
The implementation of Conservative Economic Theory did not work in the early Twentieth Century. Those “Robber Barons” were aptly named. And the USA needed a “New Deal” from Franklin Roosevelt to dig out from under the devastation caused by the Conservatives. It remains to be seen whether voters will understand that the present economic failure of the United States is due to putting Conservative theories into use. Or, will they will blame it on immigration, environmentalists or gay marriage.
We need some kind of “New Deal” to break the downward economic “flat spin” that our country and most of the world economy is in. We may need a world wide “New Deal” to get us out of the coming “Great (Twenty First Century) Depression. Can we do it or will we be stuck with a world of nations that have morphed into extensions of crime syndicates.
From Today’s New York Times in Opinion- Tom Friedman:
June 29, 2008
Op-Ed Columnist
Anxious in America
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Just a few months ago, the consensus view was that Barack Obama would need to choose a hard-core national-security type as his vice presidential running mate to compensate for his lack of foreign policy experience and that John McCain would need a running mate who was young and sprightly to compensate for his age. Come August, though, I predict both men will be looking for a financial wizard as their running mates to help them steer America out of what could become a serious economic tailspin.
I do not believe nation-building in Iraq is going to be the issue come November — whether things get better there or worse. If they get better, we’ll ignore Iraq more; if they get worse, the next president will be under pressure to get out quicker. I think nation-building in America is going to be the issue.
It’s the state of America now that is the most gripping source of anxiety for Americans, not Al Qaeda or Iraq. Anyone who thinks they are going to win this election playing the Iraq or the terrorism card — one way or another — is, in my view, seriously deluded. Things have changed.
Up to now, the economic crisis we’ve been in has been largely a credit crisis in the capital markets, while consumer spending has kept reasonably steady, as have manufacturing and exports. But with banks still reluctant to lend even to healthy businesses, fuel and food prices soaring and home prices declining, this is starting to affect consumers, shrinking their wallets and crimping spending. Unemployment is already creeping up and manufacturing creeping down.
The straws in the wind are hard to ignore: If you visit any car dealership in America today you will see row after row of unsold S.U.V.’s. And if you own a gas guzzler already, good luck. On Thursday, The Palm Beach Post ran an article on your S.U.V. options: “Continue to spend upward of $100 for a fill-up. Sell or trade in the vehicle for a fraction of the original cost. Or hold out and park the truck in the driveway for occasional use in hopes the market will turn around.” Just be glad you don’t own a bus. Montgomery County, Md., where I live, just announced that more children were going to have to walk to school next year to save money on bus fuel.
On top of it all, our bank crisis is not over. Two weeks ago, Goldman Sachs analysts said that U.S. banks may need another $65 billion to cover more write-downs of bad mortgage-related instruments and potential new losses if consumer loans start to buckle. Since President Bush came to office, our national savings have gone from 6 percent of gross domestic product to 1 percent, and consumer debt has climbed from $8 trillion to $14 trillion.
My fellow Americans: We are a country in debt and in decline — not terminal, not irreversible, but in decline. Our political system seems incapable of producing long-range answers to big problems or big opportunities.
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.nytimes.com/
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Another Bad Deal for Baghdad
I would be surprised if the present leaders in Iraqi do not fall all over each other grabbing for a part of the $50 B bribe. I would also be surprised if our House and Senate lift a finger to stop the Bush/Cheney $50 B bribe that is otherwise known as the “strategic alliance”.
Think of it as a $50 B gift to an organized crime system that is created by and defended by the USA.
Jim
June 17, 2008
Op-Ed Contributor
Another Bad Deal for Baghdad
By KARL E. MEYER
WITH only perfunctory debate, the Bush administration is pressuring a divided Iraqi government to approve a security agreement that could haunt Washington’s relations with Baghdad for years to come. The “strategic alliance” that President Bush is proposing eerily resembles, in spirit and in letter, a failed 1930 treaty between Britain and Iraq that prompted a nationalist eruption in Baghdad, a pro-Nazi military coup and a pogrom that foreshadowed the elimination of Baghdad’s ancient Jewish community.
The outline of the deal, which has not been made public, has been described by a high-level Iraqi insider, Ali A. Allawi, a moderate Shiite who was a post-invasion finance minister. Writing this month in The Independent of London, Mr. Allawi noted a disturbing parallel between the proposed alliance between the United States and Iraq and the earlier treaty that formally ended Iraq’s post-World War I status as a British mandate.
“The treaty gave Britain military and economic privileges in exchange for Britain’s promise to end the mandate over the country,” Mr. Allawi wrote. “The treaty was ratified by a docile Iraqi Parliament but was bitterly resented by nationalists. Iraq’s dependency on Britain poisoned Iraqi politics for the next quarter-century. Riots, civil disturbances, uprisings and coups were all features of Iraq’s political landscape, prompted in no small measure by the bitter disputations over the treaty with Britain.”
Under the 1930 pact, Iraq had to consult Britain on security issues and allow it the use of Iraqi airports, ports, railways and rivers. Two major military bases were leased to the British, who were empowered to station their forces throughout Iraq. British personnel were granted immunity from local prosecution.
Almost 80 years later, the Bush administration seeks a startlingly similar arrangement. While not formally a treaty (having been carefully crafted to avoid the requirement of Senate ratification), the wide-ranging pact that the United States proposes nearly replicates the 1930 accord. According to press reports based on leaks from the Iraqi
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/opinion/17meyer.html?hp
Think of it as a $50 B gift to an organized crime system that is created by and defended by the USA.
Jim
June 17, 2008
Op-Ed Contributor
Another Bad Deal for Baghdad
By KARL E. MEYER
WITH only perfunctory debate, the Bush administration is pressuring a divided Iraqi government to approve a security agreement that could haunt Washington’s relations with Baghdad for years to come. The “strategic alliance” that President Bush is proposing eerily resembles, in spirit and in letter, a failed 1930 treaty between Britain and Iraq that prompted a nationalist eruption in Baghdad, a pro-Nazi military coup and a pogrom that foreshadowed the elimination of Baghdad’s ancient Jewish community.
The outline of the deal, which has not been made public, has been described by a high-level Iraqi insider, Ali A. Allawi, a moderate Shiite who was a post-invasion finance minister. Writing this month in The Independent of London, Mr. Allawi noted a disturbing parallel between the proposed alliance between the United States and Iraq and the earlier treaty that formally ended Iraq’s post-World War I status as a British mandate.
“The treaty gave Britain military and economic privileges in exchange for Britain’s promise to end the mandate over the country,” Mr. Allawi wrote. “The treaty was ratified by a docile Iraqi Parliament but was bitterly resented by nationalists. Iraq’s dependency on Britain poisoned Iraqi politics for the next quarter-century. Riots, civil disturbances, uprisings and coups were all features of Iraq’s political landscape, prompted in no small measure by the bitter disputations over the treaty with Britain.”
Under the 1930 pact, Iraq had to consult Britain on security issues and allow it the use of Iraqi airports, ports, railways and rivers. Two major military bases were leased to the British, who were empowered to station their forces throughout Iraq. British personnel were granted immunity from local prosecution.
Almost 80 years later, the Bush administration seeks a startlingly similar arrangement. While not formally a treaty (having been carefully crafted to avoid the requirement of Senate ratification), the wide-ranging pact that the United States proposes nearly replicates the 1930 accord. According to press reports based on leaks from the Iraqi
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/opinion/17meyer.html?hp
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
the Change is for real
Some saw the chance of the first woman President of the United States and others saw the chance of the first black President of the United States. Those that are somewhat color blind heard another first; a message not heard since the 1940’s: government for the common man.
When the excitement of a woman and a black person becoming POTUS wears off we will be left with a decision. Do we continue doing things the Nixon, Regan, Bush way? Or are we willing to support a White House and a political party that listens more to ordinary people and less to the military industrial complex, insurance companies and energy companies.
In the words of Democratic Party Chairperson Howard Dean:
“As of this morning, if you're a federal lobbyist, or if you control political action committee donations, we won't be accepting your contribution.
This is an unprecedented move for a political party to make -- one that has sent shockwaves through Washington and has turned the debate on clean campaigns upside down.”
Combine the blocking of lobbyist and special interest financed campaigns with the 50 State Strategy and I believe that you have the biggest change in modern American politics since Roosevelt and the New Deal. A woman or a mixed race man running in a presidential election will pale in comparison. K STREET in DC will change to k street in DC.
Your voice will heard, the Change is for real, Happy Days are Here Again
Any summertime event can be a voter registration event for you. You can make you own Register to Vote HERE T shirt with a magic marker; a visible sign on a bag or briefcase will work also. Just have a supply of voter registrations with you all the time.
Call the Democratic Party Headquarters for voter registrations at: 37 South High St., West Chester, PA 19382 (Phone) 610-692-5811 (Fax) 610-692-8474
If you are in the Coatesville area, email me at:
DemocratJim@gmail.com
There is lots of up to the minute information on the Chester County Democratic Committee website:
http://chescodems.org/
Listen more than you talk, you can learn something from anyone.
When the excitement of a woman and a black person becoming POTUS wears off we will be left with a decision. Do we continue doing things the Nixon, Regan, Bush way? Or are we willing to support a White House and a political party that listens more to ordinary people and less to the military industrial complex, insurance companies and energy companies.
In the words of Democratic Party Chairperson Howard Dean:
“As of this morning, if you're a federal lobbyist, or if you control political action committee donations, we won't be accepting your contribution.
This is an unprecedented move for a political party to make -- one that has sent shockwaves through Washington and has turned the debate on clean campaigns upside down.”
Combine the blocking of lobbyist and special interest financed campaigns with the 50 State Strategy and I believe that you have the biggest change in modern American politics since Roosevelt and the New Deal. A woman or a mixed race man running in a presidential election will pale in comparison. K STREET in DC will change to k street in DC.
Your voice will heard, the Change is for real, Happy Days are Here Again
Any summertime event can be a voter registration event for you. You can make you own Register to Vote HERE T shirt with a magic marker; a visible sign on a bag or briefcase will work also. Just have a supply of voter registrations with you all the time.
Call the Democratic Party Headquarters for voter registrations at: 37 South High St., West Chester, PA 19382 (Phone) 610-692-5811 (Fax) 610-692-8474
If you are in the Coatesville area, email me at:
DemocratJim@gmail.com
There is lots of up to the minute information on the Chester County Democratic Committee website:
http://chescodems.org/
Listen more than you talk, you can learn something from anyone.
Saturday, June 7, 2008
Let's register more voters!
Hello Everyone~
What a week!!!:):):) Now that Barack is the *****Democratic candidate for November's election*****, we are gearing up and kicking-off our Summer Voter Registration Campaign Kick-Off.
Since everyone worked so hard on the primary, everyone deserves a well-earned rest from our election activities so we have devised a creative way to make things simple this summer.
All of us can attend summer events and register voters! Sound like fun? Read on...
Here is a list of fun events happening in our region.
What's the pay-off? Summer Fun+Newly Registered Voters+WE HELP ELECT BARACK OBAMA AS THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!!! A winning combination...
Regardless what you do this summer, you can become a Summer Voter Registration Ambassador for Barack at family picnics, park visits, sports events, concerts, or when walking, fishing, shopping, filling up, etc., etc., etc.
If interested, we will get all the materials you need: Register to Vote Here T-Shirt and voter registration form packets. Here is our list so far...
What a week!!!:):):) Now that Barack is the *****Democratic candidate for November's election*****, we are gearing up and kicking-off our Summer Voter Registration Campaign Kick-Off.
Since everyone worked so hard on the primary, everyone deserves a well-earned rest from our election activities so we have devised a creative way to make things simple this summer.
All of us can attend summer events and register voters! Sound like fun? Read on...
Here is a list of fun events happening in our region.
What's the pay-off? Summer Fun+Newly Registered Voters+WE HELP ELECT BARACK OBAMA AS THE NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!!! A winning combination...
Regardless what you do this summer, you can become a Summer Voter Registration Ambassador for Barack at family picnics, park visits, sports events, concerts, or when walking, fishing, shopping, filling up, etc., etc., etc.
If interested, we will get all the materials you need: Register to Vote Here T-Shirt and voter registration form packets. Here is our list so far...
- July 17th Modena County Historical Town Tour (evening) 610-384-6777 or 470-7162 reservation/info
- June 7th French Creek State Park National Trails Day 10-4 July 21st Parkesburg Movies in the Park
- June 21st Honey Brook Fireman’s Carnival ALL DAY July 23rd Cochranville Fireman’s Carnival
- June 28th 9th Annual Fiesta Latina Coatesville Cultural Society July 24th Cochranville Fireman’s Carnival
- July 1st Parkesburg Fair 6:00-10:00 pm July 25th Cochranville Fireman’s Carnival
- July 2nd Parkesburg Fair 6:00-10:00 pm July 26th Cochranville Fireman’s Carnival
- July 3rd Parkesburg Fair 6:00-10:00 pm July 26th Gaelic Concert Coatesville Cultural Society 8:00 pm $15/kids free
- July 4th Parkesburg Fair 1:00-10:00 pm (fireworks) August 4th Parkesburg Movies inthe Park
- July 4th Good Neighbor Day Downingtown (table) 8:00 am-10:00 pm (fireworks)
- July 5th Parkesburg Fair 1:00-10:00 pm August 9th Valley Days (Westwood Fire Company) 12:00 -5:00 pm (table)
- July 12th Coatesville Concert and Fireworks Gateway Park 5:00 pm to 10:00 pm
- July 12th Coatesville Victorian Ice Cream Festival Gateway Park 10:00 am to 5:00 pm
- August 9th Hibernia Park Fiddler’s Picnic 10:00 am to 6:00 pm (table)
- September 27th Springton Manor Family Day 10:00 am to 4:00 pm $5 parking fee
Monday, June 2, 2008
Clinton moves to steal delegates
I think that most Democrats now understand that if we should nominate the Clintons for president:
· We will then face a nation full of extremely hostile Black voters.
· We will need to win the election without votes from people under forty years old.
The Clinton’s time would be better spent on how to overcome the hostility towards them in Harlem.
Betrayal is very hard to forgive.
Jim Pitcherella
Published on Capitol Hill Blue (http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont)
Clinton moves to steal delegates
As Barack Obama turns to concentrate on his general election challenge, his rival Hillary Rodham Clinton is mounting a last ditch campaign to stay relevant in what is left of the Democratic presidential contest.
The former first lady enters this week with an insurgent strategy not only to win over undecided superdelegates but to peel away Obama's support from those party leaders and elected officials who already have committed to back him for the nomination.
"One thing about superdelegates is that they can change their minds," she told reporters aboard her campaign plane Sunday night.
Obama displays no signs of worry, pivoting toward his new contest with Republican John McCain and responding to Clinton with a shrug. And some of Clinton's own backers are saying the time is near for her to fall in behind him.
Obama, campaigning in Mitchell, S.D., confidently predicted Clinton "is going to be a great asset when we go into November."
"Whatever differences Senator Clinton and I may have, those differences pale in comparison to the other side," he said.
South Dakota and Montana, which hold primaries on Tuesday, are the last Democratic nominating contests. Obama is favored in both states and he goes into them with 2,069 delegates, 47 away from the number now needed to secure the nomination. Clinton has 1,915.5 delegates.
Obama has made up most of the ground he lost Saturday when the national party's rules committee agreed to reinstate delegates from Michigan and Florida. The party had initially refused to seat the delegates as punishment for scheduling their contests in violation of party rules.
With 31 delegates at stake Tuesday, Obama could close the gap further and cue undecided superdelegates to come to his side.
But Clinton argues she now leads in the popular vote — a debatable point given that she relies on Michigan and Florida outcomes. None of the candidates campaigned in either state and Obama received no votes in Michigan because he removed his name from the ballot. Clinton also continues to present herself as better able to confront McCain in the fall.
She and her campaign's national chairman, Terry McAuliffe, both made it clear Sunday night that Obama's supporters were now fair to pluck with those arguments.
To drive the point home, Clinton invited Virgin Islands superdelegate Kevin Rodriguez, a recent convert, to travel with her to South Dakota where she planned to campaign Monday. Rodriguez had initially supported Clinton, switched to Obama, and recently returned to her camp.
"This has been such an intense process," she said, "I don't think there has been a lot of time for reflection. It's only now that we're finishing these contests that people are going to actually reflect on who is our stronger candidate."
Her decision, if prolonged, is not likely to sit well with party leaders and some of her own supporters. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., have both
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/8142
· We will then face a nation full of extremely hostile Black voters.
· We will need to win the election without votes from people under forty years old.
The Clinton’s time would be better spent on how to overcome the hostility towards them in Harlem.
Betrayal is very hard to forgive.
Jim Pitcherella
Published on Capitol Hill Blue (http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont)
Clinton moves to steal delegates
As Barack Obama turns to concentrate on his general election challenge, his rival Hillary Rodham Clinton is mounting a last ditch campaign to stay relevant in what is left of the Democratic presidential contest.
The former first lady enters this week with an insurgent strategy not only to win over undecided superdelegates but to peel away Obama's support from those party leaders and elected officials who already have committed to back him for the nomination.
"One thing about superdelegates is that they can change their minds," she told reporters aboard her campaign plane Sunday night.
Obama displays no signs of worry, pivoting toward his new contest with Republican John McCain and responding to Clinton with a shrug. And some of Clinton's own backers are saying the time is near for her to fall in behind him.
Obama, campaigning in Mitchell, S.D., confidently predicted Clinton "is going to be a great asset when we go into November."
"Whatever differences Senator Clinton and I may have, those differences pale in comparison to the other side," he said.
South Dakota and Montana, which hold primaries on Tuesday, are the last Democratic nominating contests. Obama is favored in both states and he goes into them with 2,069 delegates, 47 away from the number now needed to secure the nomination. Clinton has 1,915.5 delegates.
Obama has made up most of the ground he lost Saturday when the national party's rules committee agreed to reinstate delegates from Michigan and Florida. The party had initially refused to seat the delegates as punishment for scheduling their contests in violation of party rules.
With 31 delegates at stake Tuesday, Obama could close the gap further and cue undecided superdelegates to come to his side.
But Clinton argues she now leads in the popular vote — a debatable point given that she relies on Michigan and Florida outcomes. None of the candidates campaigned in either state and Obama received no votes in Michigan because he removed his name from the ballot. Clinton also continues to present herself as better able to confront McCain in the fall.
She and her campaign's national chairman, Terry McAuliffe, both made it clear Sunday night that Obama's supporters were now fair to pluck with those arguments.
To drive the point home, Clinton invited Virgin Islands superdelegate Kevin Rodriguez, a recent convert, to travel with her to South Dakota where she planned to campaign Monday. Rodriguez had initially supported Clinton, switched to Obama, and recently returned to her camp.
"This has been such an intense process," she said, "I don't think there has been a lot of time for reflection. It's only now that we're finishing these contests that people are going to actually reflect on who is our stronger candidate."
Her decision, if prolonged, is not likely to sit well with party leaders and some of her own supporters. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., have both
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/8142
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)