Some local elections are decided by 11 votes. This can be challenged in court. Been there done that.
FASCISTS ON THE SUPREME COURT TRY TO MAKE ELECTION SUPPRESSION THE LAW OF THE LAND.
PROJECT 2025, JUST LIKE RUSSIA.
VIDEOS BELOW:
Michael Popok explains how the new Supreme Court order affects all those in Arizona who have not yet registered, and how Democrats and Harris-Walz can use this to mobilize Arizona voters to crush Trump in this important battleground state.”
AND:
How Russia Has Used Its Legal System as a Political Weapon | WSJ Timeline
“The high court’s order allows the enforcement of restrictions that bar people from voting in state and local elections if they don’t provide proof of citizenship when they register while the legal fight continues in lower courts.
State voter registration forms submitted without “documentary proof of citizenship” will now be rejected by Arizona counties, Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said. People can still register to vote in presidential and congressional elections with a different federal form that requires people to swear they are citizens under penalty of perjury, but does not require proof.
“My concern is that changes to the process should not occur this close to an election, it creates confusion for voters,” Fontes said in a statement. “We respect the Court’s decision and will implement these changes while continuing to protect voter access and make a voting simple process.”
Rick Hasen, an election law expert and professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, wrote in a blog post that proof of citizenship laws “matter a lot. They stand to literally disenfranchise thousands of eligible voters for no good reason.”
MORE AT:
AP
Supreme Court rejects GOP push to block 41K Arizona voters, but partly OKs proof of citizenship law
BY LINDSAY WHITEHURST AND JACQUES BILLEAUD
Updated 10:17 PM EDT, August 22, 2024
Trump Vote Scheme PUT ON ICE by Supreme Court:
Justice Clarence Thomas AFFINITY TOWARD BRIBES would allow him to FLOURISH IN RUSSIA'S OLIGARCH LEGAL SYSTEM.
CLARENCE THOMAS' BENEFACTOR HARLEN CROW IS ESSENTIALLY AN OLIGARCH ATTEMPTING TO CONTROL THE SUPREME COURT.
How Russia Has Used Its Legal System as a Political Weapon | WSJ Timeline
From Joseph Stalin to Vladimir Putin, Russian leaders have updated and evolved the country’s legal system. Yet for all of its reforms, it remains a tool that can be used to crack down on dissent and opposition.
WSJ takes a look at how Russia's justice system has been used through various periods of history.
According to the Republican Party 2025 plan Trump would use Stalin type mass arrests. SEE THE NEW YORK TIMES:
The New York Times
Sweeping Raids, Giant Camps and Mass Deportations: Inside Trump’s 2025 Immigration Plans
If he regains power, Donald Trump wants not only to revive some of the immigration policies criticized as draconian during his presidency, but expand and toughen them.
By Charlie SavageMaggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan
Nov. 11, 2023
PROJECT 2025 JUST LIKE RUSSIA:
Severely limiting abortion access nationwide by reversing the FDA’s approval of mifepristone, a drug used in medication abortion, and reviving a 19th century law, the Comstock Act, to ban any abortion medications, equipment, or materials from being sent through the U.S. Postal Service.
Targeting immigrant communities through mass deportations and raids, ending birthright citizenship, separating families, and dismantling our nation’s asylum system.
Exploiting the executive branch’s vast and unprecedented powers to spy on Americans’ lives with warrantless surveillance of our data.
Violating the First Amendment by using federal law enforcement to target journalists and protestors.
Abusing executive power to interfere in our elections by criminalizing the voting process and damaging fair representation.
Censoring academic discussions about race, gender, and systemic oppression, in violation of the First Amendment, and promising to cut federal funding for schools with curricula that touch on these subjects.
Weaponizing federal law to require states and private actors to discriminate against transgender people by threatening to sue schools that protect the rights of trans students or telling hospitals that they would lose their Medicaid funding if they provide gender-affirming medical care to trans adolescents.
FROM:
ACLU
No comments:
Post a Comment
You can add your voice to this blog by posting a comment.