Is Russia attempting to control local & state elections? Page views on my Coatesville Dems Blog, about local politics & corruption, more than doubles from Russia & former Soviet nations months before an election, then suddenly drops off after Election Day.

Chester County, PA is one of the few counties in the U.S. that has verifiable paper ballots. Chester County is rare. Most of Pennsylvania’s elections are easy to hack and Russian Army intelligence knows exactly how to do it. 

I believe Russia is attempting to control local & state elections. 

Page views on my Coatesville Dems Blog, that is mostly about local politics & corruption, more than doubles because of views from Russia & former Soviet nations in the months before an election, then suddenly drops off after Election Day.  

Coatesville Dems "Audience" showing which countries view my blog are here:

Tuesday, May 22, 2018

In the weeks preceding a local election in Coatesville PA my blogs are viewed by Russians. Look at the stats on my blogs. On May 16, 2018 the Russian views collapsed. This has happened since 2016.

Our voting systems were designed to be easily hacked by Republicans. 

SEE: 

"While Diebold has received the most attention, it actually isn’t the biggest maker of computerized election machines. That honor goes to Omaha-based ES&S, and its Republican roots may be even stronger than Diebold’s."

MORE AT: 

Diebold’s Political Machine

"From a political perspective, Kirshbaum's concerns are understandable. After all, we are talking about providing a second opportunity for a presidential candidate whose "Freedom Party" was founded by former Nazis. But, as Brad Friedman has so frequently urged, election integrity is not about Left or Right. It's about right and wrong.

In that light, the July 1, 2016 decision issued by Austria's Constitutional Court represents a major victory for election integrity --- one that elevates what it describes as the fundamental prerequisite of ensuring "transparency in the establishment of the electoral result." 

The court ruled that two individuals in each election district --- a chief and an assistant election officer --- must be personally present during the opening and counting of all mail-in ballots. Anything less opens up the prospect of a manipulated count.

Significantly, the party challenging the electoral result does not have to prove a manipulation of the result. If it was possible to manipulate enough ballots to alter the outcome, the official results must be set aside and a new election scheduled.

If applied by the U.S., the reasoning adopted by Austria's Constitutional Court would produce a fundamental and beneficial change in how our own elections are conducted..."

MORE AT:

 Austrian Court's Call for Second Presidential Election is a Victory for Election Integrity