They were once heroes. The Clintons and Jim Crow racism

The Clintons are changing their place in history. They stand the chance of being remembered as fair weather friends who used Blacks to further their own political interests and that they are really just southern white segregationists. I don’t know if that is really true but it does look that way.

They were once heroes.
Jim Pitcherella

Published on Capitol Hill Blue (http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont)
The Clintons and Jim Crow racism
Hillary Clinton Thursday admitted that she is the candidate of dumb whites - no more, no less.
As her campaign continues its slide into the dustbin of political also-rans, she told USA Today that she should be president because ignorant white people want her in the White House and they are the only people who really matter in this election year.
In other words, she said vote for me because I'm white because the black guy from Chicago doesn't stand a chance in this racially-divided nation.
Reports USA Today [1]:
In an interview Wednesday with USA TODAY, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton said that she would be the stronger nominee because she appeals to a wider coalition of voters -- including whites who have not supported Barack Obama in recent contests. "I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on," she said. As evidence, Clinton cited an Associated Press article that she said "found how Sen. Obama's support among working, hard-working Americans, white Americans, is weakening again, and how whites in both states who had not completed college were supporting me."
A card-carrying member of the Ku Klux Klan could made a statement any more racist or ignorant.
Writes an angry Eugene Robinson [2] in The Washington Post:
From the beginning, Hillary Clinton has campaigned as if the Democratic nomination were hers by divine right. That's why she is falling short -- and that's why she should be persuaded to quit now, rather than later, before her majestic sense of entitlement splits the party along racial lines.
If that sounds harsh, look at the argument she made Wednesday, in an interview with USA Today, as to why she should be the nominee instead of Barack Obama. She cited an Associated Press article "that found how Senator Obama's support . . . among working, hardworking Americans, white Americans, is weakening again. I have a much broader base to build a winning coalition on."
As a statement of fact, that's debatable at best. As a rationale for why Democratic Party superdelegates should pick her over Obama, it's a slap in the face to the party's most loyal constituency -- African Americans -- and a repudiation of principles the party claims to stand for. Here's what she's really saying to party leaders: There's no way that white people are going to vote for the black guy. Come November, you'll be sorry.
You can't blame Robinson for being
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE HERE:
http://www.capitolhillblue.com/cont/node/7168